…Uhm… British Scientists are looking for WHAT in ... ~ hehe what if folks that every~thin we've been told/taught bout "our" world is bull/shit HUH ...what if ? "some/body" knows or IS starting to ????????????
If
you've been following the strangeness in Antarctica, you can add some
more strangeness, and this ranges from a completely unsubstantiated
rumor, which we'll get to in a moment, to something that is a little
more than... well, creepy, which will be the subject of our trademark
High Octane Speculation de jour.
So
let's look at the unsubstantiated rumor. When Ms. K.F. sent this to me,
I looked at the subject header, and said out loud to my empty office,
"You've got to be kidding!" I clicked on the link and found this:
Now, I have no
idea where this story is coming from, and in the limited time I've had
to do various searches for it, I've not been able to find exactly where -
if anywhere - this is coming from. So, I'm filing this in the
"Unsubstantiated But Definitely Interesting Rumor" file. Normally I
wouldn't even mention something like this, other than for the fact that
of all the strange, and on occasion weird, people on the "People
Associated with Antarctica List," Newt Gingrich would certainly fit
right in there with Rudolf Hess, Hermann Goering, Richard Byrd, King
Juan Carlos, Prince Harry, Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin, Secretary of
State John Kerry, and the Patriarch of Moscow, Kiril III. (Our only
advice to Mr. Gingrich is that if he really is intending to go
look at penguins and study climate change, that he take Nancy Pelosi and
John McCain with him, and leave them there.) But seriously, even if
this is unsubstantiated rumor, consider only what this very bizarre list adds up to:
1) The Reichsleiter of the Nazi Party until 1941 (Hess);
2) The founder and head of the Luftwaffe and founder of the Gestapo (Goering);
3) An American admiral and arctic explorer;
4) The King of Spain;
5) A British Prince;
6) The chief diplomat of the USA in the final months of the Obama administration;
7) A Christian hierarch and head of the Russian Orthodox Church.
Add Mr. Gingrich and one has "Former Speaker of the American House of Representatives" and former candidate for President.
(And
this is all supposed to be about climate change? Sorry, I'm not getting
the connection between Hermann Goering, Rudolf Hess and climate change,
thank you very much.)
Boil that
list down and you have representatives of (1) militaries (2)
intelligence agencies (3) royalty (4) politics (5) International
diplomacy (6) space programs and (7) religion. Hmmm...
Turning
from the "Unsubstantiated But Definitely Interesting Rumor" file to
something much more substantial (and shared by many here), we discover
that scientists in Great Britain want to go there to.... well, read it
for yourself:
After
I picked my jaw up off the floor after having read this, my first
thought was, "Gee, isn't it interesting what people will do once they
vote to BREXIT and get out from underneath Mad Madame Merkel's thumb and
are free to do their own thing?" Why, the first thing they want to do
is go to Antarctica to look for "the remains of these ancient
proto-planets (which) will allow us to understand conditions in the
early years of our Solar System." Now, these are all perfectly
respectable British scientists, and there is of course a perfectly
respectable British and typically scientific "low key" explanation for
all this:
Mathematician Dr Geoffrey Evatt will lead the expedition, which will set off in 2020.He believes Antarctica could be hiding vast numbers of “missing iron meteorites”.He said: “We now have the opportunity to commence on a truly exciting scientific adventure. If successful, our expeditions will help scientists to decode the origins of the Solar System and cement the UK as a leader in meteoritics and planetary science.”
Wot!?!? You mean the United Kingdom is not a leader in meteoritics?!?
Now
the reader probably detected a heavy note of sarcasm in my remarks
(unless of course, they're a recent product of the American educational
system, where the word "sarcasm" will remain a deep, profound, and
Inscrutable Mystery). And that brings me to my high octane speculation de jour, for it sounds an awfully lot like what these British scientists might
be looking for is confirmation of the late 18th-early 19th century
astronomical theory that the asteroid belt is the remains of an exploded
planet that blew up aeons ago, a theory which was revived by the late
US Naval astronomer Dr. Tom Van Flandern. Now the interesting thing
about Dr. Van Flandern, if you've read his book(Dark Matter, Missing Planets, and New Comets), or if you've read my summary of it in my book (The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics, and Ancient Texts),
is that he proposed a number of models as to why that missing planet
suddenly blew up. One of his proposals was that a sort of natural
fission reactor in the core of the planet -and yes there are such things
as natural fission reactors, or at least, scientists think there could
be - suddenly went critical, and kablooey, the planet blew up. But in
reading Dr. Van Flandern's book, you can tell that he isn't very taken
with that idea. After all, that would require a very BIG
natural fission reactor, and that's problematic for a whole host of
reasons we don't have time to get into here. Then he proposed another
natural model: suppose, he said, there was a great accumulation of
anti-matter somehow in the core of the planet, that was contained, but
that the containment broke down, the anti-matter came into contact with
matter and, again, kablooey, it blew up. That too, you can tell he was
not to thrilled with, because, as a scientist, he knew that the
matter/anti-matter anisotropy phenomenon was hugely problematic, as was
the idea that somehow, a natural containment was fashioned to contain
enough anti-matter to cause a planet to blow up, not to mention the idea
that, once having proposed such a natural containment mechanism, it
then somehow broke down. The natural explanations had too many ifs, and
he wasn't considering too carefully that idea of collisions with other
celestial bodies, because that too had its problematic elements.
So
then Dr. Van Flandern came - somewhat reluctantly - to the idea that it
was caused by some sort of "technological accident", say, perhaps
(though he does not say this) that they built their large
hadron collider just a little too big, and slammed one too many God
particles into one too many anti-God particles. And then, finally, he
comes right out and says what I suspect he may have been thinking all
along, or at least entertaining the idea for the sake of "completeness"
in hypotheses, namely, that the planet was blown up - in his
words - by "deliberate action," in other words, in an act of war. And
that, of course, implies a technology of weapons of mass destruction
capable of doing so. And of course, if one is blowing up planets with
such technologies in an act of war, then that implies that the planet
itself may have been home to intelligent life, was a belligerent in that
war, and at a similar pitch of technological and warmaking capability.
...and
that implies that maybe, just maybe, by dint of some fluke of chance,
or by dint of that very high pitch of technological development itself,
that some sliver or slivers of that technology might have survived, to
be recognizeable and recoverable in meteorites...
No comments:
Post a Comment